afvfan
Senior Member
Member since: December 2012
Bob
Posts: 1,772
Dec 10, 2012 17:32:38 GMT -5
Dec 10, 2012 17:32:38 GMT -5
|
Post by afvfan on Dec 16, 2015 6:14:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by dierk on Dec 16, 2015 6:28:55 GMT -5
Looking good Bob! Nice solution on the barrel to prevent brewer's droop.
|
|
|
Post by wouter on Dec 16, 2015 8:11:21 GMT -5
Hi there Bob, great build so far, very cool indeed!
Cheers
|
|
|
Post by Deano on Dec 16, 2015 8:51:56 GMT -5
Excellent job on the old kit , battle damage looks great !
|
|
|
Post by wing_nut on Dec 16, 2015 15:28:42 GMT -5
Looks good. looking forward to some color.
|
|
|
Post by wbill76 on Dec 16, 2015 20:26:36 GMT -5
Doing justice by the old kit Bob, can't blame you for wanting a little more on that barrel support. Especially with the weight of the aluminum/brass combo.
|
|
afvfan
Senior Member
Member since: December 2012
Bob
Posts: 1,772
Dec 10, 2012 17:32:38 GMT -5
Dec 10, 2012 17:32:38 GMT -5
|
Post by afvfan on Dec 16, 2015 20:40:09 GMT -5
Thanks Dierk. The drooping problem is sure easier to fix with a complete gun by just adding a counterweight to the breach. You have to get a bit creative on those that don't. I'm just glad the mount design allowed for such an easy fix. Hey Wouts, thanks for stopping in. Deano - I like the challenge a lot of the older kits provide. With patience, persistence, some AM goodies, and a fair amount of off-color vows , you can match almost any new release, usually at a sizable savings. Glad you like the damaged areas. I almost feel some refinements are going to be needed on the left rear corner. I'll have to wait until after the primer to get a better feel for it. Marc - Me too! I've been idle too long.
|
|
afvfan
Senior Member
Member since: December 2012
Bob
Posts: 1,772
Dec 10, 2012 17:32:38 GMT -5
Dec 10, 2012 17:32:38 GMT -5
|
Post by afvfan on Dec 16, 2015 20:44:16 GMT -5
Doing justice by the old kit Bob, can't blame you for wanting a little more on that barrel support. Especially with the weight of the aluminum/brass combo. There's no way the original system would have supported it otherwise. Heck, I have doubts about it working with the kit barrel that well.
|
|
|
Post by Leon on Dec 17, 2015 5:48:23 GMT -5
Great progress and neat fix for the barrel Bob!
|
|
adt70hk
Forum Moderator
Member since: November 2015
Currently attempting to build something decent!!! ;)
Posts: 2,833
MSC Staff
Nov 17, 2015 7:23:30 GMT -5
Nov 17, 2015 7:23:30 GMT -5
|
Post by adt70hk on Dec 17, 2015 7:21:24 GMT -5
Looking a like a great start and the battle damage looks very nicely done!!
|
|
|
Post by dupes on Dec 17, 2015 11:24:55 GMT -5
Nothing wrong with old Dragon kits. They just need some love.
Looks great!
|
|
|
Post by panzerjager2 on Dec 17, 2015 11:42:10 GMT -5
Nice work. The PE is looking good
|
|
afvfan
Senior Member
Member since: December 2012
Bob
Posts: 1,772
Dec 10, 2012 17:32:38 GMT -5
Dec 10, 2012 17:32:38 GMT -5
|
Post by afvfan on Dec 17, 2015 12:39:04 GMT -5
Thanks Leon. Luckily the stems on both the mount and the barrel were close to the same size. It wasn't too much trouble modifying the brass insert to work with both. ADT - Appreciate the comment. The real trick with damage is getting the finish right. We'll see how that goes. Got that right, Mark. I've built so many of them now, their instructions don't even bother me anymore. PJ2 - Thanks. The PE is a mix of Griffon, the kit supplied fret, and bits and pieces out of and old CMK Bergpanzer set. The kit fret is made of the old steel crap. It holds the shape well, but is nearly impossible to modify. Honestly, I don't even know why I used it. The Griffon stuff is brass, and the set is very extensive. My main problems with it were that I felt it was a bit too thick, and some of the assemblies were needlessly complicated. Thankfully, I had the CMK frets in my parts stash. That really solved a lot of potential headaches.
|
|
SMJmodeler
Junior Member
Member since: October 2015
Posts: 90
Oct 28, 2015 13:55:05 GMT -5
Oct 28, 2015 13:55:05 GMT -5
|
Post by SMJmodeler on Dec 18, 2015 17:36:39 GMT -5
afvfan: I always admire good PE work and creative problem solving! I see you're going for some major battle-damage simulation that started with the ripping of the fender and then bent the support brackets & piping down the starboard side...it'll be fun to see how that comes together! Idea/ Suggestion: That front fender is SO torn up it'd be a good candidate for complete removal...good way to show off the track weathering too! Couple things I noticed: Is that battle wear you're trying to depict on the back deck cover by the hinges or does that need some filing? Same concern on top back of hull/turret: The two large pieces that make up the back of the superstructure and back plate don't appear flush...is that simulated welding or does it need filing?...it's hard to tell from the pic's.
|
|
afvfan
Senior Member
Member since: December 2012
Bob
Posts: 1,772
Dec 10, 2012 17:32:38 GMT -5
Dec 10, 2012 17:32:38 GMT -5
|
Post by afvfan on Dec 18, 2015 18:10:27 GMT -5
SMJ - Thanks for the kind words, and the comments and suggestions. On the front fender, I felt it looked more interesting there, but torn up, than it would if it were just removed altogether. Which hinges are you referring to? I don't see what you do. As for the back superstructure seam, it's flush. It just seems to be off in the pic. Thanks for the post. This is exactly the type of comment I love getting.
|
|
SMJmodeler
Junior Member
Member since: October 2015
Posts: 90
Oct 28, 2015 13:55:05 GMT -5
Oct 28, 2015 13:55:05 GMT -5
|
Post by SMJmodeler on Dec 19, 2015 10:13:10 GMT -5
afvfan: See comments below. "On the front fender, I felt it looked more interesting there, but torn up, than it would if it were just removed altogether."
Oh-kee-doh-kee. Just be sure to be looking for view angles that give away the thickness of the styrene and file those thin so it looks more realistic. You may need to saw it off, do the filing and re-glue. FYI: I tried something similar once on a KV-1 and I was a bit disappointed that I depicted a ripped & sheared fender versus bashed & dented...make sense?, food-for-thought. Cool idea! "Which hinges are you referring to? I don't see what you do."
I'm referring to the raised hatch cover next to the port side grille on the rear deck. On the opposite side of the added PE handle the long edge looks chewed-up. "As for the back superstructure seam, it's flush. It just seems to be off in the pic."
Good to hear...I suspected it might just be the photo. "Thanks for the post. This is exactly the type of comment I love getting."
You're welcome. I try to give thoughtful input.
|
|
|
Post by deafpanzer on Dec 19, 2015 11:15:14 GMT -5
Oh man, I LOVE IT! More please...
|
|
afvfan
Senior Member
Member since: December 2012
Bob
Posts: 1,772
Dec 10, 2012 17:32:38 GMT -5
Dec 10, 2012 17:32:38 GMT -5
|
Post by afvfan on Dec 19, 2015 22:21:11 GMT -5
SMJ - The fender has already been thinned. Did that before it was even mounted. On this old kit the fenders were molded on to the upper half. The real trick was cutting it loose from the hull leaving the inside bend intact and not damaging the side of the hull it was molded to. I hear you about the removal idea, though, and have done so numerous times. Just figured I'd be different this time. Ah, okay, the box lid. I noticed that. It really does look terrible in the picture. Looking at it on the tank, not so much, But I'll see about cleaning it up a bit before paint. "Thoughtful input" is one of the reasons I post on the forums (here and elsewhere). Unfortunately, getting it seems elusive at times. Andy - Thanks bud! More's on the way.
|
|
SMJmodeler
Junior Member
Member since: October 2015
Posts: 90
Oct 28, 2015 13:55:05 GMT -5
Oct 28, 2015 13:55:05 GMT -5
|
Post by SMJmodeler on Dec 21, 2015 10:28:10 GMT -5
afvfan: Sounds like you're on it with that fender. Looking forward to seeing the paint fly!
About thoughtful input...I am always a bit leery of adding constructive criticism when people post their work. There's a lot of blood, sweat & tears that go into our projects and I'm worried that my comments will be taken as negative/ too critical/ I'm a "know-it-all". You're responses were just the opposite and I'm glad you took them the way I intended. I guess I just assume everyone wants to improve their skills/ builds.
|
|
afvfan
Senior Member
Member since: December 2012
Bob
Posts: 1,772
Dec 10, 2012 17:32:38 GMT -5
Dec 10, 2012 17:32:38 GMT -5
|
Post by afvfan on Dec 21, 2015 13:58:57 GMT -5
Got the primer laid down this morning. As feared (and expected) it shows a bit more refining needs to be done in some areas. I'll get to those after the primer cures out. SMJ - I totally fall square in the middle of the group the last line in your post refers to. I'm not a master builder, but wouldn't mind aiming for that level. I welcome any and all comments, as long as they're not outright hateful. The ones you made in this thread are all valid and were rationally presented. Feel free to comment on anything I post. I'm an old SOB with thick skin, and a warped sense of humor. You'll be hard pressed to say anything to rile me up.
|
|
|
Post by wbill76 on Dec 21, 2015 20:24:26 GMT -5
That's what primer is for Bob...perfect opportunity to find the 'do-over' spots before you commit to paint. Can't tell you how many times I've gone back over spots that looked great right up until the primer went on.
|
|
afvfan
Senior Member
Member since: December 2012
Bob
Posts: 1,772
Dec 10, 2012 17:32:38 GMT -5
Dec 10, 2012 17:32:38 GMT -5
|
Post by afvfan on Dec 22, 2015 1:11:33 GMT -5
Yeah, it either let's you know what still needs more work, or where to put the tarps and extra mud.
|
|
afvfan
Senior Member
Member since: December 2012
Bob
Posts: 1,772
Dec 10, 2012 17:32:38 GMT -5
Dec 10, 2012 17:32:38 GMT -5
|
Post by afvfan on Dec 24, 2015 19:08:42 GMT -5
Primer's cured out and preshade has been added. Pretty much ready for the paint phase to start.
|
|
|
Post by Leon on Dec 24, 2015 19:45:32 GMT -5
Primer and Pre shading are looking good Bob!
|
|
afvfan
Senior Member
Member since: December 2012
Bob
Posts: 1,772
Dec 10, 2012 17:32:38 GMT -5
Dec 10, 2012 17:32:38 GMT -5
|
Post by afvfan on Dec 24, 2015 20:33:48 GMT -5
Thanks Leon.
|
|
Tojo72
Forum Moderator
Sept '24 Showcased Model Awarded
Member since: November 2012
Posts: 5,318
Member is Online
MSC Staff
Nov 14, 2012 19:46:28 GMT -5
Nov 14, 2012 19:46:28 GMT -5
|
Post by Tojo72 on Dec 25, 2015 8:24:10 GMT -5
Preshading good.....looking forward to paint.
|
|
|
Post by wbill76 on Dec 25, 2015 18:32:44 GMT -5
Now the fun begins.
|
|
afvfan
Senior Member
Member since: December 2012
Bob
Posts: 1,772
Dec 10, 2012 17:32:38 GMT -5
Dec 10, 2012 17:32:38 GMT -5
|
Post by afvfan on Dec 25, 2015 21:25:55 GMT -5
Anthony & Bill - Thanks guys. The "fun" will begin as soon as I figure out what I'm going to do with the beastie. I was thinking at first to do a whitewash on it, but I'm afraid there's way too many little fidgety things that could be knocked off during the process. With that option taken off the table, I'm left with the choice between a solid dunkelgelb, or a tri-color camo scheme. On a sidenote, it seems SMJ's eyes are a lot better than mine. He was totally right about the seam on the rear of the superstructure. What looked good to me turned out to be a wretched mess when it was primed. I straightened it out the best I could without removing the tiny PE tiedown points. Unfortunately, it was a lost cause. I can only hope the paint hides the problem, otherwise I may have to resort to a drape of some sorts.
|
|
SMJmodeler
Junior Member
Member since: October 2015
Posts: 90
Oct 28, 2015 13:55:05 GMT -5
Oct 28, 2015 13:55:05 GMT -5
|
Post by SMJmodeler on Dec 26, 2015 11:20:33 GMT -5
afvfan: A few suggestions to get to that seam prepped for sanding:
1. Did you try CA removal gel to remove those PE tie-downs? I've had limited success with the stuff, but it's worth a try. It might soften things just enough to help suggestion #2.
2. Or how about a new SUPER sharp x-acto?
I suspect there's so little glue on those bad boys that you could GENTLY work the tip in there and they'd pop right off. Be SURE to provide a "parts catching" area/ backdrop though because they will go flying!
Even if you had to wittle-away the styrene a bit you could easily repair that with putty and filing. A small metal file will clean the glue off the PE before re-attachment. A bit of force might tweak the PE too but I suspect that could be bent back into shape easily. Food for thought...tough call.
Future reference: I close my eyes and use my fingertips when checking seams or areas where I'm doing a lot of sanding...as Obi-Wan says "Your eyes can deceive you, don't trust them" -I assume you remember that from the 1977 Star Wars movie. I run my fingers over the area I'm working on to be sure that I CAN'T detect my work.
I hope that is helpful...
|
|
|
Post by TRM on Dec 27, 2015 0:33:01 GMT -5
Nice to see this making it to the booth Bob! I am excited to see this come alive under a little paint! Have fun!! PM on its way...
|
|