maschinenkrueger
Reviews member
Jan & Dec 2014 MoM Winner
Member since: June 2012
You want MaK with that?
Posts: 836
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
|
Post by maschinenkrueger on Feb 1, 2018 15:44:32 GMT -5
The KV-7 U-14 Heavy Assault Tank was another unusual attempt to mount more firepower to the KV chassis to increase bunker-busting capabilities. The original iteration - the KV-7 U-13 had two 45mm and one 76mm gun mounted on the same gun mount. The 45mm was ineffective in trials so the prototype was modified to fit twin ZiS-5 76mm guns. The plan called for 1/5 of KV production to be a KV-7. These never made it past prototype stage. Can't imagine why? I will be using Trumpeters KV-7 09504 kit for this Right off the bat I noticed two things that need to be addressed. The kit has continuous fenders but there is a gap in the fenders under the casemate. This will need to be trimmed and the gap under the casemate filled. And the applique armor welded to the front of the casemate isn't very pronounced on the kit. It's more obvious on this photo of the U-13. Additional information can be found here: Tank Archives
|
|
maschinenkrueger
Reviews member
Jan & Dec 2014 MoM Winner
Member since: June 2012
You want MaK with that?
Posts: 836
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
|
Post by maschinenkrueger on Feb 1, 2018 15:47:19 GMT -5
Like most recent Trumpeter KV kits, it has some accuracy issues and detail shortcuts. The main guns, gun shield and mantle do not match the photos and need further work. Aber is releasing a set of turned aluminum barrels that fit both the two and three barrel versions of the KV-7. Unfortunately Aber made the same mistakes Trumpeter did on the twin ZiS-5 L/42 guns. The guns do not have the armored collar at the base and should be a smooth taper. The gun shield is missing the armored access plates for the guns. I corrected the mantle to be a one piece cast part with a cut to clear the gun optics. The casemate welds and cut edges are vague or missing and are in progress. Plus Trumpeter screws the modeler over yet again with those dreadful delicate seams that need to be filled around the acorn periscopes. It looks pretty cool in the low angle shots so I plan to stick with it. :lol: I took the tracks from the KV-19 for the photos. I havn't purchased any aftermarket for this yet. Yet.
|
|
|
Post by panzerjager2 on Feb 1, 2018 21:18:44 GMT -5
Pretty DARN COOL.... I kinda like the 3 barrel job... NICE WORK PJ2
|
|
|
Post by dierk on Feb 2, 2018 7:30:29 GMT -5
Excellent work! Well done fixing the kit's shortfalls. It is a shame Trumpy couldn't maintain the fairly high standard they set with their early KV kits. Having said that, some of them had minor problems too.
|
|
maschinenkrueger
Reviews member
Jan & Dec 2014 MoM Winner
Member since: June 2012
You want MaK with that?
Posts: 836
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
|
Post by maschinenkrueger on Feb 2, 2018 10:16:45 GMT -5
Thanks! Spent last night adding more welds.
I think on this and many of the KV prototypes, Trumpeter are just getting lazy in their rush to get kits to market. The new unique parts for the KV-7, the KV-220 have had pretty soft and simplified details. The upcoming KV-3 is going to have the same problems plus a wrong turret shape.
They released a fine KV-1 in 2005, but the molds and part design are starting to show their age. Extra flash, pitting, excessive ejector pin marks, some questionable part assembly/alignment. This may have been OK 13 years ago but now... Would be nice if Miniart tackled the KV series with a full interior!
|
|
|
Post by dierk on Feb 2, 2018 11:03:46 GMT -5
Always a shame when companies start resting on their laurels. Personally I still rate the early KV Trumpy kits, especially considering their low cost.
|
|
|
Post by tobias5555 on Feb 2, 2018 11:34:09 GMT -5
Very cool build
|
|
thechaos
Full Member
June '24 Showcased Model Awarded
Member since: May 2015
Posts: 1,164
May 3, 2015 8:13:16 GMT -5
May 3, 2015 8:13:16 GMT -5
|
Post by thechaos on Feb 5, 2018 15:19:29 GMT -5
Gread work, it looks so good with the Metal tracks.
|
|
|
Post by deafpanzer on Feb 6, 2018 15:15:18 GMT -5
Way too cool!!! Double or none... great bet you are making!
|
|
maschinenkrueger
Reviews member
Jan & Dec 2014 MoM Winner
Member since: June 2012
You want MaK with that?
Posts: 836
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
|
Post by maschinenkrueger on Feb 8, 2018 13:19:27 GMT -5
I think I'm going to set this one aside. After some further discussion and research, there are just toooooooo many errors on this kit.
Wrong... Roof layout Acorn periscopes Gun Mantle Gun Shield Main Guns Hull top armor plates Nose corner plate Periscope guards Transmission deck Road Wheels Return rollers Casemate location
The main guy at PanzerArt is working on a correction/conversion set but it could be a while.
Life is too short for crappy kits.
|
|
maschinenkrueger
Reviews member
Jan & Dec 2014 MoM Winner
Member since: June 2012
You want MaK with that?
Posts: 836
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
|
Post by maschinenkrueger on Mar 28, 2018 9:51:58 GMT -5
Trying to avoid all the detail painting needed on the Pershing, I dusted this one off the shelf-o-shame. I decided it was not worth correcting the kit errors - I would need to start over - so I decided to plow ahead and added my own errors to the kit. I'm not sure on the symmetrical stowage after looking at the photos. Will work on that next.
|
|
|
Post by dierk on Mar 28, 2018 11:19:17 GMT -5
Maybe you should change the title of this thread to 'Double your Pain'? Such a shame that this kit seems to be held together by its numerous faults - I know how you feel: I was so delighted when HobbyBoss released the T-35, that I ordered one before it got reviewed. Spent serious money on metal barrels lots more on resin figures...got as far as the early stages of weathering when I found out HB got the measurements off the internet, which, of course, were wrong
|
|
John Everett
Full Member
Member since: January 2012
July, 2016 MoM Winner
Posts: 1,278
Jan 17, 2012 0:53:48 GMT -5
Jan 17, 2012 0:53:48 GMT -5
|
Post by John Everett on Mar 28, 2018 13:19:47 GMT -5
They're not errors. They're "historical speculation".
And it's not like they made a zillion copies of these. Perhaps your version is a perfect duplicate of one of the prototypes.
|
|
maschinenkrueger
Reviews member
Jan & Dec 2014 MoM Winner
Member since: June 2012
You want MaK with that?
Posts: 836
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
|
Post by maschinenkrueger on Mar 28, 2018 13:50:36 GMT -5
Dierk - Bummer on the T-35. Which version has the errors? Or do all of them? I keep thinking of building the T-35. Is the Zvezda one better?
John - Trumpeter is historically accurate to a thumbnail sketch.
|
|
|
Post by panzerjager2 on Mar 28, 2018 18:02:48 GMT -5
Really nice work on this build PJ2
|
|
maschinenkrueger
Reviews member
Jan & Dec 2014 MoM Winner
Member since: June 2012
You want MaK with that?
Posts: 836
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
|
Post by maschinenkrueger on Apr 2, 2018 10:29:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by dierk on Apr 3, 2018 3:30:33 GMT -5
Dierk - Bummer on the T-35. Which version has the errors? Or do all of them? I keep thinking of building the T-35. Is the Zvezda one better? John - Trumpeter is historically accurate to a thumbnail sketch. All the Trumpy kits are based on the same, wrong, measurements. The Zvezda kit is correct - they used the one in Kubinka to base their kit on...and it's cheaper.
|
|
|
Post by Leon on Apr 3, 2018 3:45:12 GMT -5
Looking good,despite all the errors!
|
|
maschinenkrueger
Reviews member
Jan & Dec 2014 MoM Winner
Member since: June 2012
You want MaK with that?
Posts: 836
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
|
Post by maschinenkrueger on Apr 3, 2018 9:10:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by dierk on Apr 4, 2018 12:33:58 GMT -5
The link just connects to this thread - I'd be interested to see it.
|
|
maschinenkrueger
Reviews member
Jan & Dec 2014 MoM Winner
Member since: June 2012
You want MaK with that?
Posts: 836
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
|
Post by maschinenkrueger on Apr 6, 2018 12:15:06 GMT -5
Let's try that again... >Link<
|
|
pt109
Full Member
Member since: April 2013
Stop staring at me! heheheh
Posts: 491
Apr 15, 2013 23:52:11 GMT -5
Apr 15, 2013 23:52:11 GMT -5
|
Post by pt109 on Jun 9, 2018 23:41:00 GMT -5
Interesting.....did the main guns fire together? What a strange idea......
|
|
maschinenkrueger
Reviews member
Jan & Dec 2014 MoM Winner
Member since: June 2012
You want MaK with that?
Posts: 836
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
|
Post by maschinenkrueger on Jun 19, 2018 14:25:49 GMT -5
Interesting.....did the main guns fire together? What a strange idea...... Simultaneous or independently. Test showed either approach wrecked the alignment of the sights.
|
|
maschinenkrueger
Reviews member
Jan & Dec 2014 MoM Winner
Member since: June 2012
You want MaK with that?
Posts: 836
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
|
Post by maschinenkrueger on Jul 25, 2018 9:29:45 GMT -5
ARISE Necropost! :lol: After a few setbacks I am resurrecting this build. A prior botched HS attempt forced me to soak the whole thing in Windex. This soak took the finish back the the bare plastic so I had to spend some time again filling and sanding surface imperfections so that was fun... But this allowed me to address one of the minor details that bothered me. The MG turret periscope guards. Previously I used some spare SU-152 guards from an old Bronco kit but these would put a production/modification date to mid 43 and I wanted to represent something a little earlier. I created small periscopes and guards in 3D CAD and sent the files to be printed at Shapeways using the ultra high resolution material. The part printed is 1"x1" square with enough extras in case I busted some up cutting them from the plate. Only one was lost in the process so that's good. Here is the raw plate. It's difficult to make out the surface finish but there are fine build lines present. The lenses for the periscopes have a fine rough finish. The parts sit on a 0.015" tall boss so I was able to cleanly slice them off with a razor saw. Here I attached them to the MG turret. I brushed a coat of Mr Surfacer 1000 and lightly sanded them smooth. The base kit has been preshaded with Nato Black. I think i will clean it up with some brush painted pre-highlights. I hope to paint this weekend. I know it's a minor detail on kit ripe with errors but the old guards were bugging me the moment I glued them one. Never give up! Never surrender!
|
|
|
Post by wbill76 on Jul 25, 2018 9:51:18 GMT -5
Why not go for it since it's v2 on the paint anyhow! Looking good.
|
|
maschinenkrueger
Reviews member
Jan & Dec 2014 MoM Winner
Member since: June 2012
You want MaK with that?
Posts: 836
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
|
Post by maschinenkrueger on Jul 25, 2018 12:29:28 GMT -5
Thanks Bill. I'm thinking a green with brown camo.
|
|
maschinenkrueger
Reviews member
Jan & Dec 2014 MoM Winner
Member since: June 2012
You want MaK with that?
Posts: 836
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
|
Post by maschinenkrueger on Jul 30, 2018 9:40:04 GMT -5
|
|
maschinenkrueger
Reviews member
Jan & Dec 2014 MoM Winner
Member since: June 2012
You want MaK with that?
Posts: 836
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
|
Post by maschinenkrueger on Aug 2, 2018 9:10:24 GMT -5
Camo bands and first filters. I've got a lot of work ahead. Markings next.
|
|
|
Post by wbill76 on Aug 2, 2018 18:44:43 GMT -5
Looks like the pattern went down nice and smooth, making good progress on v2!
|
|
maschinenkrueger
Reviews member
Jan & Dec 2014 MoM Winner
Member since: June 2012
You want MaK with that?
Posts: 836
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
Jun 7, 2012 9:50:05 GMT -5
|
Post by maschinenkrueger on Aug 6, 2018 16:17:42 GMT -5
Thanks Bill. It feels good to make the effort to finish this. I don't like abandoning projects. A couple of washes followed by oil paint highlights. Markings are airbrushed using Montex masks. Parts are still not glued so mind the gaps.
|
|