Deleted
Member since: January 1970
Posts: 0
Nov 22, 2024 14:34:39 GMT -5
Nov 22, 2024 14:34:39 GMT -5
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2014 20:56:04 GMT -5
Certainly enjoyed this voyage Bill ! The a.m. wood deck looks superb . All the rest of the added details along with your painting and weathering technique made her a proud looking ship model . sweet looking build Bill .
|
|
|
Post by wbill76 on Sept 19, 2014 21:43:28 GMT -5
Thanks Boyd and Carl! Glad you like how the proud old lady turned out!
|
|
|
Post by bullardino on Sept 20, 2014 5:47:40 GMT -5
Fantastic result, Bill
|
|
Gordon Ferguson
Junior Member
Member since: April 2012
Posts: 85
Apr 3, 2012 10:22:22 GMT -5
Apr 3, 2012 10:22:22 GMT -5
|
Post by Gordon Ferguson on Sept 20, 2014 5:50:22 GMT -5
Superb, just love the finish very subtle but enough weathering just to emphasise the fine moulding, your refinements have moved this up to museum quality
|
|
|
Post by 406 Silverado on Sept 20, 2014 8:06:41 GMT -5
Well Bill, you seemed to have built another masterpiece and showed that it is some times good to get out of ones comfort zone. Hats off to you brother.
|
|
|
Post by wbill76 on Sept 20, 2014 10:42:31 GMT -5
Thanks Lui! Gordon, high praise indeed, thank you kindly sir! This one is going to 'live' with a very good friend of mine who is a retired history teacher. He had a chance to see it in person last night and was afraid to even breathe on it...now the challenge is to find a good display case for it so he can rest easy with it! Rob, it's all your fault...you're the one who got me started in ship building with the Z38! Between you and Todd, it's an evil scheme I tell you. You're right about doing something different every now and then, this one had some 'firsts' for me that stretched the envelope a bit and upped the enjoyment factor too, always a great combo. Glad you like how it all turned out!
|
|
Foenetik
Full Member
November '24 Showcased Model Awarded
Member since: March 2014
Posts: 609
Mar 31, 2014 3:05:49 GMT -5
Mar 31, 2014 3:05:49 GMT -5
|
Post by Foenetik on Sept 21, 2014 0:19:18 GMT -5
amazing job!
|
|
|
Post by deafpanzer on Sept 21, 2014 0:40:16 GMT -5
BRILLIANT! BEAUTIFUL! STUNNING! One of my favorites coming out of El Paso man cave for sure... catching up here. Hell I hope mine comes as half good as yours!!!
|
|
|
Post by wbill76 on Sept 21, 2014 10:02:55 GMT -5
Thanks Tony! Andy, I don't think you've got anything to worry about with the Indy other than how long it will take for you to finish it! I estimate that the Dreadnought took about 150 man-hours to complete from start to finish so that should give you a good idea of what you're in for with your floaty!
|
|
|
Post by Tojo72 on Sept 21, 2014 10:58:15 GMT -5
Great finish, inspiring as I have not tried a ship in awhile.
Sent from my SM-N900V using proboards
|
|
afvfan
Senior Member
Member since: December 2012
Bob
Posts: 1,772
Dec 10, 2012 17:32:38 GMT -5
Dec 10, 2012 17:32:38 GMT -5
|
Post by afvfan on Sept 21, 2014 15:27:32 GMT -5
Nice finish, Bill! She looks great. (insert 2 thumbs up here) On a sidenote, I have to wonder what the designers were thinking with the lifeboat placement. One good hit to the central area of the superstructure and everybody's swimming from the sharks!
|
|
|
Post by wbill76 on Sept 21, 2014 19:10:26 GMT -5
Thanks Anthony! You should give one a whirl every now and then, definitely is a nice change of pace. Bob, it's interesting that you mention that. I'm currently reading 'Steel Castles' about the naval war in WWI and one of the things they mentioned as a wartime expedient was the removal and stowage ashore of all of the steam pinnaces, leaving only the minimum number of boats in place due to fire concerns. Since the zone of operation for these ships was primarily the North Sea, sharks weren't so big an issue...but freezing in the water sure would be!
|
|
Gordon Ferguson
Junior Member
Member since: April 2012
Posts: 85
Apr 3, 2012 10:22:22 GMT -5
Apr 3, 2012 10:22:22 GMT -5
|
Post by Gordon Ferguson on Sept 23, 2014 9:34:07 GMT -5
Re lifeboats stowage, it's worth trying to place this in a historical context. At the time these dreadnoughts a were designed and built the RN was the most powerful and successful navy the world had ever seen ......... You did not fire on a RN ship , never mind sink it ! So survival of the crew after a sinking was never really considered. To a great extent this also reflected thinking within the Merchant fleet , just think of the Titanic disaster a few years later.
I cannot think of a RN ship sunk through enemy action from about 1870 thro to 1914 , plenty were sunk through incompetence , storms ,etc and this was at time when usually somewhere in the globe the RN was in action most of the time.
These things outgunned and were faster and more heavily armoured than just about everything else, the Germans were supposed to be building comparable ships hence the arms race at that time ........ This proved to be a true but only to avery limited extent. The Japanese had ships close to these as proved in the Russian Sino fleet actions in 1905, but as we built most of there ships there were not quite at the same level. The only real threat to them were the small torpedo boats , air power had still not arrived yet, but dreadnoughts were not used in isolation and were only deployed with significant numbers of destroyers , cruisers, etc who acted as a screen and longe range protection for the capital ships ........ Exactly the same as the U.S. navy uses missile destroyers, etc as a screen for the aircraft carriers.
The dreadnoughts were far from perfect, Armour plating was definitley too thin in places and that's ignoring the manufacturing process where the Germans, specifically Krupps were far superior .... But this always happens in warship design where you are balancing wieght against speed , consider the unarmed decks of WW11 American aircraft carriers with the catastrophic results of kamikaze raids
|
|
|
Post by deafpanzer on Sept 24, 2014 19:55:07 GMT -5
Andy, I don't think you've got anything to worry about with the Indy other than how long it will take for you to finish it! I estimate that the Dreadnought took about 150 man-hours to complete from start to finish so that should give you a good idea of what you're in for with your floaty! 150+ hours?!?!!? I am D-O-O-M-E-D then!
|
|
|
Post by wbill76 on Sept 26, 2014 16:18:57 GMT -5
Andy, I don't think you've got anything to worry about with the Indy other than how long it will take for you to finish it! I estimate that the Dreadnought took about 150 man-hours to complete from start to finish so that should give you a good idea of what you're in for with your floaty! 150+ hours?!?!!? I am D-O-O-M-E-D then! Just pace yourself Andy and you'll do fine!
|
|
moramarth
Full Member
Member since: March 2014
Posts: 455
Mar 17, 2014 7:45:01 GMT -5
Mar 17, 2014 7:45:01 GMT -5
|
Post by moramarth on Sept 27, 2014 0:09:47 GMT -5
Not too sure about this bit - everyone used the same processes but with a slight variation in quality. "KC" referred to a type of armour ("Krupp Cemented") rather than the actual manufacturer. IIRC, post WW2 tests suggested British and German armour was, weight-for-weight, pretty much on par with each other, US armour being slightly inferior and Japanese markedly so. However, this latter view may be influenced by a single test item (a turret face plate left over when "Shinano" was built as an aircraft carrier rather than a battleship) which may have been defective.
Regards,
M
|
|
|
Post by bbd468 on Oct 1, 2014 11:58:14 GMT -5
Bravo Bill, a stunning piece of work right there! 10/10
|
|
|
Post by wbill76 on Oct 1, 2014 13:32:46 GMT -5
Bravo Bill, a stunning piece of work right there! 10/10 Thanks Brother Gary! Glad you like how she turned out.
|
|
Rick
Full Member
Member since: March 2013
what to build, what to build . . . Ok THAT one!
Posts: 854
Mar 3, 2013 9:59:21 GMT -5
Mar 3, 2013 9:59:21 GMT -5
|
Post by Rick on Oct 1, 2014 13:47:26 GMT -5
Everything they said Bill. Wow! I'll bet the original never looked this good!
Rick
|
|
|
Post by wbill76 on Oct 1, 2014 14:12:11 GMT -5
Thanks Rick! It was probably the most enjoyable (and different!) build I've done in a while.
|
|
DeafStuG
Full Member
Member since: May 2013
..
Posts: 1,283
May 9, 2013 18:50:50 GMT -5
May 9, 2013 18:50:50 GMT -5
|
Post by DeafStuG on Oct 6, 2014 17:59:18 GMT -5
Beautiful build.
|
|
|
Post by wbill76 on Oct 7, 2014 11:46:28 GMT -5
Thanks Jeremy! It was a fun build that I enjoyed and worked out perfectly with the break I had available time-wise. Glad you like how she turned out.
|
|
|
Post by `Boots` on Nov 8, 2014 19:59:11 GMT -5
WOW......that is one dam fine ship ya gawn and done there Bill, super detail and finish.
|
|
|
Post by wbill76 on Nov 9, 2014 12:12:55 GMT -5
Thanks Boots! I had a lot of fun building it!
|
|
mrversatile
Full Member
July '23 Showcased Build Awarded
Member since: January 2013
Posts: 681
Jan 20, 2013 10:52:24 GMT -5
Jan 20, 2013 10:52:24 GMT -5
|
Post by mrversatile on Feb 5, 2015 20:44:39 GMT -5
Sorry Bill, I am new to the forum so I am catching up on some of these builds, and I am glad I found this one. Very nicely done. A clean build you should be proud of.
|
|
|
Post by wbill76 on Feb 6, 2015 13:32:33 GMT -5
Sorry Bill, I am new to the forum so I am catching up on some of these builds, and I am glad I found this one. Very nicely done. A clean build you should be proud of. Thanks Gil! Had a lot of fun with it and learned some things along the way as well.
|
|
|
Post by armorguy on Feb 6, 2015 18:47:36 GMT -5
This build is ridiculously impressive. Tons of fine detail, you gotta LOVE this big girl !!!
|
|
|
Post by wbill76 on Feb 7, 2015 18:43:46 GMT -5
This build is ridiculously impressive. Tons of fine detail, you gotta LOVE this big girl !!! Thanks Guy! Had a blast working with it in all the different areas. Since she was the first of her kind, figured I might as well do her proud!
|
|
|
Post by armorguy on Feb 7, 2015 18:55:08 GMT -5
You sure did my friend !
|
|